Zur Hauptnavigation springenZum Inhalt springen

PMMA in Digital Prosthetics: Material Science, Indications & Milling Quality Compared

|Digital dentistry, Materials

Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) has been one of the most established polymers in dental prosthetics for decades. Traditionally, it has been primarily used for denture bases and provisional restorations. However, the digitalization of dentistry—particularly the adoption of CAD/CAM systems—has significantly expanded both the range of applications and the quality level of PMMA. Today, milled PMMA restorations achieve a level of precision and mechanical stability that conventionally polymerized materials rarely offer—an advantage that is increasingly reflected in the daily workflows of dental laboratories, in-house practice labs, and milling centers.

With the transition from manual processing to industrially polymerized PMMA blanks, both the mechanical properties and clinical success parameters have evolved. Studies show that CAD/CAM-milled PMMA bases exhibit lower porosity, higher flexural strength, and better material homogeneity than heat-polymerized alternatives (Joda et al., 2021). At the same time, new indication areas have emerged, such as occlusal splints, long-term esthetic provisionals, and temporary implant-supported prosthetics.

This article provides a scientifically grounded overview of PMMA material science, clinical indications, and the advantages of digitally milled PMMA restorations. The analysis is based on systematic reviews, in vitro studies, and well-established review articles and is intended for users who wish to optimize their manufacturing strategies or make informed decisions regarding material selection.

1. Technological Background

1.1 Fundamentals of PMMA

PMMA is a thermoplastic polymer characterized by high biocompatibility, low water absorption, and favorable mechanical properties. Its use in prosthetics is based on a combination of structural stability, processing flexibility, and esthetic adaptability. Traditionally, PMMA is processed via heat polymerization, a method that frequently results in internal stresses, porosities, and uneven material curing (Daou et al., 2023).

1.2 Difference Between Conventional PMMA and CAD/CAM PMMA

Industrially polymerized CAD/CAM PMMA blanks are manufactured under controlled conditions and are characterized by:

  • more homogeneous polymer chains
  • lower residual monomer content
  • higher flexural strength
  • reduced porosity

According to the meta-analysis by Al-Dwairi et al. (2021), CAD/CAM PMMA exhibits significantly higher mechanical stability than conventionally polymerized materials. Similarly, a network meta-analysis by Liu et al. (2025) confirms that milled PMMA materials are superior not only to conventional but also to 3D-printed denture bases.

These material advantages have a direct impact on clinical parameters such as fit accuracy, long-term stability, and fracture resistance. This explains why CAD/CAM PMMA is increasingly becoming the standard for high-quality, dimensionally stable long-term provisionals.

2. Practical Application / Use Cases

2.1 Provisionals (Crowns and Bridges)

PMMA is the leading material for esthetic long-term provisional restorations. Milled PMMA achieves a homogeneous microstructure that results in higher milling quality, precision, and durability compared to conventionally fabricated provisionals. Khairuddin et al. (2021) demonstrated that CAD/CAM PMMA exhibits significantly higher flexural strength and lower surface roughness, reducing fracture susceptibility while simultaneously decreasing plaque adhesion.

For in-house practice laboratories, this results in tangible advantages:

  • more precise marginal adaptation
  • reduced finishing time
  • stable, highly polishable surfaces
  • color-stable outcomes

2.2 Denture Bases

Current studies clearly demonstrate that milled PMMA denture bases are superior in terms of homogeneity and mechanical robustness. Liu et al. (2025) showed that CAD/CAM dentures exhibit significantly higher strength values than printed or conventional bases. Additionally, milled dentures demonstrate superior dimensional stability, leading to improved fit accuracy and reduced pressure points.

2.3 Therapeutic Splints

For splints—particularly night guards and therapeutic appliances—PMMA offers the following advantages:

  • high abrasion resistance
  • excellent form stability under load
  • smooth, patient-friendly surfaces

These applications benefit significantly from the process reliability of industrial PMMA blanks.

2.4 Implant Prosthetics (Temporary Solutions)

Long-term PMMA provisionals for implant-supported restorations are gaining substantial clinical relevance due to the growing demand for immediate loading concepts. Milled temporary bridges provide:

  • reliable stability under immediate loading
  • easy reproducibility
  • high-quality esthetic surfaces

3. Benefits for the Target Groups

3.1 For In-House Practice Laboratories

Practice laboratories benefit from the ability to fabricate high-quality provisionals directly on-site. Milled PMMA enables:

  • shorter production times
  • reduced finishing and adjustment work
  • reliable esthetic outcomes for patients

For dental practitioners such as the persona “Dr. Meier,” this translates directly into faster patient treatment and higher patient satisfaction.

3.2 For Dental Laboratories

Larger dental laboratories benefit from:

  • cost-effective serial production
  • reproducible fit quality
  • improved long-term stability

The existing body of research clearly shows that milled PMMA delivers consistently high material quality (Daou et al., 2023; Al-Dwairi et al., 2021).

3.3 For Milling Centers

Milling centers benefit particularly from:

  • industrial material homogeneity
  • extremely low rejection rates
  • predictable production capacities

Milled PMMA proves to be highly milling-friendly and process-efficient—an important factor for large production volumes.

4. Challenges / Limitations

Despite its advantages, PMMA has limitations that users should be aware of:

  • lower hardness compared to ceramics: PMMA remains a polymer and is not intended for definitive restorations
  • limited thermal resistance: excessive heat exposure can cause deformation
  • not a substitute for high-strength materials: ceramics or high-performance polymers are better suited for definitive bridges or extensive implant restorations

Additionally, milling results in material waste due to residual blanks compared to 3D printing. Nevertheless, for high-demand provisional restorations, the quality advantage of milling clearly outweighs this drawback.

5. Market & Future Perspectives

5.1 Developments: Milling vs. 3D Printing

The market is increasingly moving toward hybrid manufacturing processes. While 3D printing systems offer speed and cost efficiency, current research indicates that the mechanical properties of printed PMMA remain inferior to those of milled materials (Liu et al., 2025), particularly in terms of:

  • flexural strength
  • fracture toughness
  • surface homogeneity

As a result, milled PMMA is expected to remain the preferred solution for high-quality provisional restorations in the medium term, while printed PMMA will primarily be used for rapid basic fabrication.

5.2 Material Innovations

Future developments include:

  • PMMA reinforced with nanoparticles
  • optimized cross-linking structures
  • antibacterial additives
  • improved color gradients for esthetic provisionals

These trends indicate that PMMA will continue to play a key role in digital prosthetics.

6. Conclusion & Recommendations

Milled PMMA has established itself as a high-quality, precise, and versatile material in digital prosthetics. The extensive body of scientific evidence demonstrates that CAD/CAM PMMA is clearly superior to conventional and printed PMMA materials, particularly in terms of precision, mechanical strength, and surface quality.

For in-house practice laboratories, dental laboratories, and milling centers, this leads to a clear recommendation:
For durable, esthetic provisionals and precise denture bases, milled PMMA remains the gold standard in 2025.


FAQ Section

1. How does milled PMMA differ from conventionally polymerized PMMA?
Milled PMMA is industrially polymerized, resulting in a highly homogeneous structure. This leads to higher flexural strength, lower porosity, and smoother surfaces. Conventional PMMA often shows internal stresses and irregular polymerization zones.

2. How long do PMMA long-term provisionals last?
Clinical service time typically spans several months. However, due to the high stability of milled PMMA provisionals, many laboratories report significantly longer functional longevity, especially for implant provisionals.

3. Is PMMA biocompatible?
Yes. PMMA is one of the most extensively studied dental polymers and demonstrates proven biocompatibility and low water absorption. Milled PMMA also features particularly low residual monomer content.

4. Which indications are best suited for PMMA?
Typical indications include long-term provisionals, splints, denture bases, therapeutic appliances, and implant-supported temporary bridges. Due to its high dimensional stability, milled PMMA is especially suitable for precise fits.

5. How does 3D-printed PMMA compare?
Printed PMMA offers advantages in speed and cost, but it is mechanically weaker. Studies show that milled materials outperform printed PMMA in flexural strength, fracture toughness, and surface homogeneity.